Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krawk Island

From VfD:

Not a neopet, but a place where htey live. There are some more like this too that need redirecting, assuming that there are only about a dozen of these lands. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 16:52, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete the lot. No redirect.  I believe the domains are listed in the Neopet article.  If they're not, they should be.  If they shouldn't be, they shouldn't be mentioned anywhere else, either. Geogre 17:48, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Agreed. This is ridiculous.  One big Neopet article is fine.  Lots of little Neopet-lettes is a waste of time and resources.  Delete all and if someone wants to add the info to the main article, more power to him/her. - Lucky 6.9 18:05, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 19:02, 2004 Sep 3 (UTC)
 * Like Meelar said. It's what I meant in the first place but it really didn't come out that way (blush). - Lucky 6.9 23:55, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Guanaco 02:34, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 04:10, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:21, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep as merge and redirect. -- user:zanimum
 * Redirect. Joiz 20:04, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion