Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreata Global (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Kreata Global
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatant promotions only. This page or company has nothing to write about. Non-Notable for Encyclopedia material. only for publicity. 2 time deletion happen. Light2021 (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: this is the third deletion nomination for this article; the first may be found here: Articles for deletion/KreataGlobal. The second is listed in the AFD box at top right. Safehaven86 (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a blatant advertisment clear fluffpuff materials considering the only actual serious claims here are its associations with Facebook which actually means nothing, especially when considering the entire article is still an advertisement. SwisterTwister   talk  21:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging Articles for deletion/KreataGlobal participants:, , , and . Pinging Articles for deletion/Kreata Global participants: , , and . Cunard (talk) 05:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The current aticle sows so little evidence for importance that it could have been A7. Looking at the ghits, which were asserted at the previous afd to be a reason for keep, they are the model of reprinted press releases, mixed in with a few incidental mentions.  The Economic Times article is  relatively substantial, but it's about another company entirely, the only connection is that  they hired someone who had previous worked at Kreata.  Times of India, as usual, just quotes the ceo. I would   however not have nominated the  article for promotionalism, but a violation of NOT INDISCRIMINATE and NOT DIRECTORY.. DGG ( talk ) 14:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.