Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krescent 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7 no assertion that band is notable, g11 advertising. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Krescent 4

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject has no significant coverage in multiple secondary or third party reliable sources. Google search returns many ghits, but that does not meet the previously mentioned criteria. No hint in google books.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 14:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The article sports a copyright notice and probably should be deleted on those grounds alone, but the subject doesn't pass WP:MUSIC anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Contested Krescent 4 plays a major role in the Detroit Rock music scene. This article will be updated momentarily to meet "mentioned criteria" (WP:MUSIC). The copyright was deleted. Do NOT delete article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krescent4 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)  — Krescent4 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete if not speedy, for the potential and endemic copyvio. Jclemens (talk)
 * Delete Unsourced article on a non-notable band with many many problems. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * After looking at the page's edit history, it's clear it was nominated as a speedy, and the author removed the template from the page without waiting for a decision or placing a hangon template on the page or explaining why it was not a speedy candidate. I am re-tagging as A7.Beeblbrox (talk) 18:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.