Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Chemnitz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient. Star  Mississippi  02:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Kreuz Chemnitz
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Simply put, this fails to meet WP:GNG.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Germany.  Imzadi 1979   →   23:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Run-of-the-mill interchange.  Dough   4872   23:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references, and I think notability is now clear. As well, there would probably have been newspaper and magazine articles published when the structure was initially designed and built, and later when it was redesigned and rebuilt. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. And the vast majority of what you've linked is UGC or primary. Nice refbomb. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I am undecided on this nomination, but there is no need to be insulting. --Rschen7754 02:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It is quite literally a refbomb, that much is objectively true, as Eastmain dropped a pile of 8 references (largely primary) at the end of the lead section. Let's just say I'm a little frustrated at this user showing up all over the place throwing out policy-ignorant keep votes. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:MILL. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: It's just run-of-the-mill. Agreed with Trainsandotherthings. CastJared (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Agrees with the User:Trainsandotherthings comment. Yasal Shahid (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. CastJared (talk) 06:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Editor was blocked as a sock. --Rschen7754 21:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Whilst I certainly appreciate Eastmain's efforts here imho the sources all seem to be "bottom of the barrel" - The majority aren't reliable or primary sources (There's 1-2 possibly 3 I'd say were just about acceptable but the majority are rather poor). – Davey 2010 Talk 17:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice I've done some searching with and without Google News and have not found any hits, and the fact that the dewiki article is not very well sourced leads me to think there are probably not sources. If any turn up, I am open to revisiting. --Rschen7754 18:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.