Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Frankenthal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Kreuz Frankenthal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was part of a large AfD, which was closed solely for procedural reasons: Articles for deletion/Dreieck Ahlhorner Heide. Non-notable interchange, just like thousands of others.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete—as per all of my other comments in the past AfDs. Just having a name imparts no presumption of notability when every German interchange has a name.  Imzadi 1979  →   02:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * delete Cloverleaf interchange with no claim of notability. Mangoe (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is no consensus for the deletion of these German Autobahn interchange articles as a block, and insufficient time allocated by the AfD process for editors to research their GNG individually. See Articles for deletion/Kreuz Oranienburg and Articles for deletion/Kreuz Duisburg.  This particular interchange is also between two Autobahns that connect Germany with a total of three other countries, and therefore should not be presumed to be lacking in notability simply because of its configuration.   Bahnfrend (talk) 08:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Bundesautobahn 6 with template:R with possibilities We have a complete structure of German autobahns in the encyclopedia.  We even have separate templates for Dreieck and Kreuz.  The German Dreieck's and Kreuz's that are named always connect two Autobahns.  This means that any Dreieck or Kreuz is already known to be covered in two other topics already in existence on Wikipedia.  This is sufficient to know that there is no policy basis to delete the "topic", also known on Wikipedia as the "subject".  I would also argue that these topics satisfy our wp:notability guidelines, but analyzing this point between keep and merge becomes academic, given that there is no policy basis for a deletion discussion.  Any decision to redirect or merge can be handled under WP:Editing policy, which might consider more than wp:notability in the decision.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing how a redirect can be made to two different autobahn articles. Mangoe (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been using an arbtrary rule of picking the lower-numbered Autobahn to propose as the target of the redirect. There may be other ways to choose.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL cloverleaf interchange that fails GNG. As all Autobahn interchanges are named, there cannot be any special presumption of notability as there would be for named interchanges in other countries, and there is no evidence of notability otherwise as well. - The Bushranger One ping only 11:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * delete yet another interchange that fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.