Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Hagen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Kreuz Hagen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. One of a number of non-notable interchanges, which some feel are notable simply because they are named. No evidence of coming close to passing WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete—as written, this fails to meet WP:GNG.  Imzadi 1979  →  14:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is no consensus for the deletion of these German Autobahn interchanges articles as a block, and insufficient time allocated by the AfD process for editors to research their GNG individually. See Articles for deletion/Kreuz Oranienburg and Articles for deletion/Kreuz Duisburg.  The Wikipedia articles about the two Autobahns linked by this interchange indicate that the interchange was built in stages, and that the planning for one of those Autobahns at and around this location underwent a number of changes while the Autobahn was being planned and built. The two German Wikipedia articles also cite a number of reliable German language sources likely to include discussion of this interchange, including a book about one of the Autobahns linked by this interchange. Bahnfrend (talk) 09:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * delete There is no default notability for highway interchanges, and there is no claim of notability for this quite ordinary cloverleaf. Mangoe (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL cloverleaf interchange that fails GNG. As all Autobahn interchanges are named, there cannot be any special presumption of notability as there would be for named interchanges in other countries, and there is no evidence of notability otherwise as well. The fact there is a book about "one of the Autobahns linked by this interchange" is relevant to the Autobahn; the interchange does not inherit notability from its parent route. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.