Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Neunkirchen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 22:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Kreuz Neunkirchen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was part of an earlier AfD, which was closed as no consensus, due to there being a mass of articles proposed through the same discussion. Each article needed to be discussed on its own merits. This is a non-notable interchange. Just like tens of thousands of others.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete—having a name in a country where every interchange is named does not confer notability. This article fails WP:GNG and should be deleted.  Imzadi 1979  →   13:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. Nothing that can't be included in a standard exit list article, if even one of those would stand up on it's own. Transparency note: Copy and pasting this comment across 4 similar AFD's as they all fail for exactly the same reason, can't be arsed to re-word for the same thing! Jeni  ( talk ) 17:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination.  Rcsprinter123    (parlez)  16:03, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom.  Dough   4872   03:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.