Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Rostock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Kreuz Rostock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable interchange, just like thousands of others. No evidence of notability, indeed, no notability asserted in the article. Nothing but routine coverage.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * delete No claim of notability for the most ordinary of cloverleafs. Mangoe (talk) 22:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. JTtheOG (talk) 05:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete—as written, this fails the General Notability Guideline, as it does not display "significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject".  Imzadi 1979  →  13:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL cloverleaf interchange; all interchanges on Autobahns are named so there is no special presumption of notability, and no evidence of WP:GNG being met. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.