Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreynet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. The article is unsourced, not well-written, and even the keep comments here are weak ones. This subject may be notable, but this article is of no help to anyone. Good subject for a history restore once a decent article is written, however. Xoloz 17:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Kreynet
nn website Xi95 06:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per large amount of ghits [Check Google hits] that convince me it's at least somewhat notable. (|--   UlT i MuS  06:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Ultimus, though it needs a significant rewrite. --David Mestel(Talk) 07:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, there isn't enough hits in the world to make this notable--it's got a one-word name, which helps it out immediately, it's entirely not notable. -Kmaguir1 08:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If you're going by Google hits they imply the opposite of what's stated above—this returns 358 unique Google hits . Moreover, 9 hits for a Google link search and an Alexa rank of 4,510,346 . Nothing here appears to meet WP:WEB.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Googling for kreynet irc returns 894 hits . seems to indicate someone was arrested for DDoSing them (not sure if that's notable or not). —Scott5114↗ 17:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not provide any reputable published sources as required by WP:V, and I was unable to locate any.  -- Satori Son 15:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: this article is NOT about a website but an irc channel, Alexa doesn't track hits on those so it's meaningless. The unique google hits mentioned above mean 'unique hits from the first 1000 of google's hits' as usual. - Bobet 13:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Or more precisely, an IRC network. —Scott5114↗ 18:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, teaches me to write more carefully when trying to correct others. - Bobet 19:16, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.