Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Kohls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Adema. &mdash; J I P | Talk 11:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Kris Kohls
Not noteworthy, +/- vanity. POV and dull to boot. ''Yes, yes, Trollerella - the last part is not a criteria for delete. I know. Just had to put it in there.'' Ifnord 02:09, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination Paul Cyr 02:28, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for dullness. Also vanity, noteworthyness, etc. --Aquillion 04:07, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why you consider it vanity. Good article or not, it is about a living person in a notable band. Ac  e  tic  ' Acid  18:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Adema. Asserts notability, but should only be kept as an article if it can be wikified and expanded heavily. I think for now, it would be best just to redirect to his band's article. Ac  e  tic  ' Acid  04:25, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or weak redirect as above, mostly to discourage re-creation. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 14:59, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. --JJay 19:55, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Merge. The guy doesn't need his own entry, or if he does, he needs to prove it by having more than a sentence of information. Devotchka 00:37, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect  Un  focused  02:25, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.