Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Vallotton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Those commenting in favour of keeping this article failed to give appropriate policy-based reasons for their stance. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 19:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Kris Vallotton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not enough reliable, third party sources to meet our notability requirements for biographies. Essentially, fails WP:N. Another related bio to this that I nominated was Danny Silk, a pastor from the same church. Killiondude (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I would hate to see this page and the Danny Silk page removed. Give me some time and I'll try to beef up the 3rd party coverage.  These guys really are HUGE in the movement they're a part of! RichLindvall (talk) 06:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - for now and move the article back to user space until such time that it meets mandatory notability requirements...or not. I think User_talk:Houseofisaac jumped the gun a bit on this and a few other articles. He was made aware of the requirements.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 08:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neither writing a book nor founding the Bethel School of Supernatural Ministry makes him notable. StAnselm (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is not a small country church/sunday school.  Silk and Vallotton are key players in a global movement which impacts tens of thousands of people worldwide.  (Check out iBethel.tv.) I know the pages are rough.  I'll try to work on them this week.  Thanks! RichLindvall (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Rich. If you're not familiar with the AFD process, you might want to read AFD. Why should this article be kept? Keeping in mind Wikipedia's policies and scope. Killiondude (talk) 07:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! RichLindvall (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.