Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishan Lal Chugh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted under criterion G11. As per the below, this should in no way be considered to prohibit creation of a neutral, appropriate article on this individual. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Krishan Lal Chugh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references Prof TPMS (talk) 11:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

PLEASE DO NOT DELETE, the article has recently gone through many corrections and additions made by me. I am direct relative and have added factually correct information. The information does not disrupt any guidelines.additionally, Mr. K.L Chugh is well reknowned and respected in India and the page does a good job of highlighting his involvements and awards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.69.57.177 (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: I have added some references but the article need clean up and need to be rewrite per WP:NPOV. Thank You – GSS (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: have seen your comment, will correct accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.69.57.177 (talk) 10:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not seeing anything to help this pass WP:BIO. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 References  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The references listed by User:Northamerica1000 suggest that this subject may indeed be notable, and in light of these it would be amiss for me to close this as a delete just yet. Please also remember that poor sourcing/quality of content within an article does not a lack of notability make; See WP:NEXIST. More thoughts would be appreciated over the next seven days. KaisaL (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – The article is tagged for speedy deletion per WP:G11, and in its present state it will likely be deleted per this. However, the subject actually meets WP:BASIC (see some source examples below). As such, no prejudice against recreation of a neutral article based upon what reliable sources report about the subject. North America1000 06:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Business Standard
 * India Today
 * Asia Week
 * Outlook India

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.