Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Dharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus; default to "keep"  - Philippe  23:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Krishna Dharma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Book advertisemet with no reliable third party sources. Article is an advertisement for a non notable book. Also, does not meet the standards of Reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Personal website and no Reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I don't see how this aricle is at all worded like an advertisement, the information is referenced and notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurowoofwoof111 (talk • contribs)
 * My reason for questioning the references is that they are the subjects personal website. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Notable writer. Wikidās ॐ 19:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 23:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Personal website and no Reliable sources. Thanks.Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA (talk) 05:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - one of the sources above is an article by the subject of this AfD, and the other is a listing of events - possibly fails WP:RS? Need more RS to prove that Krishna Dharma is notable. -- Shruti14 t c s 21:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.