Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishneel Nair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Krishneel Nair

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Do Not Cite Any Notable Reference. Do Not Comply With GNG. I'll be more than happy if someone prove me wrong and update this article. Foodie ( talk ) 12:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NOTABILITY guidelines. --Nlfestival (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Actually, an article on this guy, with a different title, created by the same user (see his talk page), was previously speedily deleted because of copyright infringement viz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FA._Krishneel_Nair. No attempt has been made by the creator to include the subject in the Fiji Chess Federation article, which. I think, is the right place for mentioning him and his activities per http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/1-fide-news/4148--titles-approved-at-the-80th-fide-congress-.html and should suffice. - Zananiri (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete no reliable secondary sourcesCanadiancow1 (talk) 02:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking reliable sources, does not pass WP:GNG--Pointism (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.