Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krista Donnenwirth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   KEEP. TigerShark (talk) 22:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Krista Donnenwirth

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural nomiation - request for deletion made by the subject via OTRS ticket 2011091110012572. Subject has expressed concern of some of the details within the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I see very few problems with the article;it is included in many Wikiprojects,only thing missing is that the author did not comply with WP:NPOV. That's me!  Have doubt?   Track me!  12:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I respectfully don't think "a concern with some of the details within the article" is a basis to delete the whole thing. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Respectfully it's an option we afford people who write to us via OTRS, hence the procedural nature of the nomination. Specifically, the "Personal life" section is of concern to her. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I dislike how OTRS does nominations like this – most of the time it is not so much that the subject wants the article deleted as it is that they don't like that the article (in this case, a section of the article) portrays them in a negative light. It's pretty obvious from the history that the 'DUI incident' is what the subject doesn't want in the article, but seeing as it's sourced to the The Arizona Republic (apparently the 10th largest US paper by circulation) and is written in a NPOV tone, I don't see why it shouldn't be in the article. On to the actual issue of whether Donnenwirth's notable or not, the article doesn't display it well (all bar one source is non-independent), but a quick gnews search shows that she easily meets the general notability guideline. Some examples of significant coverage include:
 * "Donnenwirth adds power for ASU softball‎".The Arizona Republic.
 * "Arizona St. is one win away from NCAA sotfball crown". The New London Day. Associated Press.
 * "Arizona St. rolls in WCWS finals Game 1". ESPN. Associated Press.
 * There's plenty more like that if you keep looking through gnews. Jenks24 (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.