Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Dawodu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Kristen Dawodu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dubious notability. Sources given are puff pieces from sites that are basically promotional vehicles. Articles about him have popped up in various other Wiki sites in the past few days, which gives the impression of a PR blitz. ... disco spinster   talk  03:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  03:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  03:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources.Celestina007 08:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not satisfy general notability or special notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am quiet Confused as the coverages like This and This have discussed about him which seems to be in depth coverage but I am not aware about the reliability of these sources, so anyone knows more about Nigerian publications would be able to help more in adding the spotlight to the credibility of the sources.  Dtt1 Talk  17:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devokewater  (&#x1F989; talk talk&#x1F989;) 19:47, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete little bit confused! why this should be here?. Em-mustapha  talk  12:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.