Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kritarchy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 00:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Kritarchy
not notable, unsourced bar forum and personal essay. Possible result of trolling organisation activity  max rspct  leave a message  18:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep - The term is used in anthropology, in reference to many traditional cultures including biblical ones, on up to the Xeer in Somalia today. It is also used in political science.WickedWanda 19:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * comment: Where sources mr hogeye's sockpuppet? --  maxrspct  leave a message  21:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep - needs to be cleaned up and more closely sourced but encyclopaedic and should stay. TerriersFan 19:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep The User:max rspct has been perpetuating edit wars over at Anarchism and has quite of history of push POV all over the political spectrum. Two-Bit Sprite 19:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Strong keep. It's difficult to imagine why this was even nominated. (That said, it does need categorization.) --The Editrix 20:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep - just looking at Google results for "kritarchy" (of which there are 48,400) one can see its use in wide variety of sources. So the term clearly deserves its own article. Hence, I'd say the article needs work, not deletion. ikh (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-22 08:27Z 

Keep and clean up. Lemonsawdust 08:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep User:max rspct has been trying to get a number of political articles and templates deleted lately. Cwolfsheep 13:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * i'm not.. and why would that be illegal? -- maxrspct  in the mud  14:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.