Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kriya reiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Veinor (talk to me) 20:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Kriya reiki
The article was on prod on the ground that the Wikipedia is not a How to guide. While the article certainly needs work on the ritual itself appear to be notable to me (though I know nothing about the Indian rituals). Can the article be saved or merged somewhere? See also Vishitao Reiki for the same problem Alex Bakharev 23:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Kriya reiki gets 47 unique Ghits and it's already on the creator's user page. Also, all of his other contributions have flown in the face of WP:NOR. JuJube 23:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, same problem as Vishitao Reiki below. Only 31 ghits for, and even those 31 don't make a particularly strong case for notability.  Dave 6 talk  01:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Retain

Can you suggest the changes?
If desirable changesare suggested, I can immediately incorporate them in the article. I wish that the article stays there, and of course, meets the requirements of the site too!Rekhaa Kale 18:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Retain

Did those who know the subjects vote?
I am sorry to say that again the persons not knowing a certain subject are objecting the presence of some pages. In fact more and more new subjects giving scholarly research must be added to wikipedia to enrich it. But it is not happening. I will be happy if the articles Kriya Reiki as well as Vishitao Reiki are retained and I am given a fortnight's time to edit it and bring it to your standards after your experts give suggestions about changes.

I am a writer with more than 20 books published over last decade and about 6 of them are still doing well in market. So, I am well aware of the language requirements of publishing media. So, Please be sure that the information in the articles IS meeting standards of the subject.

As far as the format of your site is concerned, I am open to changes. But deletion means killing new authors!!!

Rekhaa Kale 18:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete spam essay, no sources, nonsensical. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  10:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete clear original research. Gwernol 16:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.