Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kronum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Poor discussion, but there's only one comment that has attempted to discuss the quality of the sources in any detail, so I'll have to give that more weight.  Sandstein  08:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Kronum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable

Many other languages have deleted. This is the 'author of the game' trying to come up with an article in order to legitimize his game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.134.254.221 (talk) 03:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Nominating on behalf of IP 73.134.254.221 who left a request for deletion on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: This game looks like it has significant third-party coverage. I can't see a good reason to delete it, although I don't have the ability to read the non-English deletion discussions. Orthogonal1 (talk) 06:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep same reason as Orthogonal1 Jigglypuff 109 (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Many of the links are dead (Yahoo ones in particular). Basically what I can find is copies of the video with a little text, but very little, and articles that reiterate, almost verbatim, the rules as stated in the article here. If there were sources for the clubs and some sports chatter about leagues and games, it would look better. As it is, it seems to be treated like a passing novelty in the "what's weird" category of the news sites rather than a "living sport". LaMona (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   14:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete although this could be notable, it just doesn't meet the requirements. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC0


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.