Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kropki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dots (game). (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Kropki

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Doesn't provide a single source, no claims of notability. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 10:39, 22 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment there is a lot at the polish wikipedia, including nice figures and stuff. References in that article look weak.  The word is so common in Polish it's hard to do a search...  I'd lean lightly toward keeping on the theory that this looks real and sources are going to be hard to find.  Hobit (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I think I can get a lot more out on this topic, please tell me what you think of my latest update. Grizato —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grizato (talk • contribs) 20:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs sources that help meet WP:N still. Basically reviews in things other than blogs and message boards, or entries in non self-published books. Hobit (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * An Entry on Board Game Geek, as an external link; will that do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.166.158.94 (talk) 09:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No, generally not for a number of reasons. One BGG is more-or-less a blog/wiki where anyone can edit as I recall.  Two it covers _everything_ which many people think means it doesn't count toward WP:N... Hobit (talk) 11:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Can this page redirect to the Dots-Game article? I just realised it's the same thing.
 * Probably a good idea. I'd say let's wait for this discussion to close at it's normal time in the hope someone else thinks it should be kept under this title and can improve it.  Otherwise I think a redirect is the best outcome. Hobit (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirecting to dots (game) seems correct, given the first sentence of that article, and indeed the interwiki links at pl:Kropki (gra). Uncle G (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dots (game) as alternate name. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Deleted content tells me it is the same game, both articles tell me it is the same game.-- Club Oranje T 10:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.