Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krumme 13


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Krumme 13

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No coverage in academic sources, and the main claim to notability is an incident that earned them only brief mention in the news. There are no reliable sources that profile them in any depth. Except for one article on the incident, the sources cited are all primary sources, and not from reliable independent news organizations. Dominic·t 07:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article fails WP:ORG--MaxEspinho (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy DeleteThis also most looks like an odd kind of seff promotion. Not notable. I also just had a thought, if we visit the web blog are we going to be taged as pedos?Slatersteven (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  14:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  14:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some news coverage exists, e.g. Der Spiegel,  Independent Online (South Africa) but too little to overcome WP:NOT in my view. Pcap  ping  14:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability, fails verifiability. One minor passing incident had a fleeting report in the news. Article has only one source, the other links on the page all connect to self-published pro-pedophile websites. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 18:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing notability. Thanks, SqueakBox talk contribs 01:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable Amphitryoniades (talk) 07:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.