Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kruxialflicks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite 22:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Kruxialflicks

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability problem. This article is about a website, the stub was apparently created by the website maker about a year ago. No assertion of sufficient notability, no sources cited, and no apparent notability from Google search. Likely COI issue. Thank you. HG | Talk 17:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  19:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this self-written advertisment for a non-notable website. Cliff smith  talk  18:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 16:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-06t18:18z
 * Delete: An advertisement for a non-notable site. Schuym1 (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.