Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krytocracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 00:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Krytocracy
Not notable. original research  max rspct  leave a message  18:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - though rarely used, it is notable. Just needs cleanup.  The word has been used by US Supreme Court justices.  Google gives 9,350 hits . ikh (talk) 18:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Not OR; it is sourced and referenced. Mind, I am not sure that the Politics panel on the right is helpful; really just more clutter. TerriersFan 19:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Ikh. --The Editrix 20:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ikh. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-22 08:23Z 
 * Keep, per ikh. Lemonsawdust 08:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep User:max rspct has been trying to get a number of political articles and templates deleted lately. Cwolfsheep 13:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * AND?? -- maxrspct  in the mud  14:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.