Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krzysztof Łoziński


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Krzysztof Łoziński

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks the significant independent coverage needed to meet the GNG. Most of the references are primary and he receives only passing mentions in the others. Jakejr (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Usually, if the subject is covered in some form of encyclopedia, it is enough. And this one has an entry in the Encyclopedia of Solidarity (movement):, which I feel is a reliable source (co-published by the Polish government, ). This, I feel, is sufficient. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per encyclopedia article noted by Piotrus. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 01:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: are we going to include 5000 people because they have an article in the encyclopedia mentioned above? Not sure if you want to set that kind of precedent. I bet there exist a few Bollywood encyclopedias as well... Prevalence (talk) 09:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass the GNG --In actu (Guerillero) &#124; My Talk  14:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I'm not up on Polish culture so I can't fully judge this, but looking at the sources listed in support of him as author, one (#7) is an interview (cannot be used for notability) and the other (#8) is by him, ditto. So from this I would say that he fails author notability. LaMona (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. It seemsthere is enough historical significance. I usually follow Piotrus's advice for Polish topics. DGG ( talk ) 17:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.