Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ksenia Kirillova (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Ksenia Kirillova
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

I've checked ITF Tennis and Core Tennis and can't see any WTA main draw appearances, any significant titles or any senior grand slam appearances for either singles or doubles. I also can't see any Fed Cup appearances nor did her junior career ever reach the level of being top 3 or winning a junior grand slam tournament. I am, therefore, concerned that WP:NTENNIS is still failed, as it was before. I also can't find anything that could be considered as significant media coverage, addressing Kirillova in depth, which was also an issue that caused this article to be deleted before.

I will happily withdraw if evidence is presented that refutes my above argument. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

. Keep As far as I know I assume it meets the requirements for playing junior fed cup in juniors.I found an article in the assets.usta.com and also one in the web.archive.org.

It's not nice to have my article deleted or nominated. While creating articles, I work like other wikipedia users. I find resources for the articles I have created. User:Vecihi91User talk:Vecihi91 20:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe a member of WP:TENNIS will correct me here but I don't think that playing in the Junior Fed Cup means that you meet WP:NTENNIS. It says Junior players are presumed to be notable if they have won at least a junior Grand Slam title, have been in the top-3 of the junior ITF world rankings, or can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. and Kirillova's junior career meets none of those. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - please note that I have asked WT:TENNIS to clarify whether Junior Fed Cup counts towards NTENNIS as that seems to be the sole claim to notability for this person. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - She does not meet ANY Project Tennis Guideline. Junior Fed Cup has no presumption of notability. Now, her team did win the Junior Fed Cup title so it is quite possible there could be GNG with her, but it will have to be proved by sourcing. What's interesting is the person who created this article also created an article this links to... 2009 Junior Fed Cup Final and dozens more like it, which also are likely to be non-notable. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * - I agree that many of the Fed Cup final articles are problematic. A few are now at AfD and PROD as a result. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, junior achievements are not notable. Geschichte (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, junior fed cup is not notable. Stryn (talk) 12:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not seeing coverage sufficient to meet GNG (which is the only relevant notability guideline). JoelleJay (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.