Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuşadasıspor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Kuşadasıspor

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A club with no SIGCOV. The only sources I could mention are statistic websites or trivial. Moving on, Kuşadasıspor also fails WP:FOOTYN, as they have never played in the Turkish Cup from what I can tell. However, I will be ok if this article is soft deleted or draftified if enough work is done to improve AND find sources. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 22:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment PROD removed with no improvement to the article. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:00, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comments - Keep? Technically they do pass WP:FOOTYN, they do play in the Turkish Cup with five record games on soccerway.com and here is one of their qualifying round games . Govvy (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Govvy, has played in the national cup and therefore considered notable. Needs improving, not deleting. Nominator has clearly not bothered with BEFORE to try and find sources. GiantSnowman 09:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Govvy passes WP:FOOTYN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm obviouly not eligible to vote this pool, but, I'd like to underline that this team competed at TFF First League, second highest football competition of the country, as well. If this club fails notability, so many clubs will need to follow. Regards. Isik (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Playing in the national cup alone is not a NFOOTYN pass: it clearly states that a club must pass the GNG, and notes that playing in the cup generally indicates that there is a GNG pass (and NFOOTYN is an essay anyways, so I see no reason to bring it up). However, I've added some extra sources (result of only a nine minute work), and I suspect there are quite more not run-of-the-mill sources out there. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 19:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nomination hinges on an erroneous statement about cup play, and the nominator's personal inability to find sources. (For what it's worth, I'm not great at browsing in the Turkish language either.) Geschichte (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I found those few sources I posted in a few seconds of a google search! :/ Govvy (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Withdrawing Nomination I realize I had made a mistake here. Apologies if this inconvenienced anyone. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.