Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuala Lumpur Cricket Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Kuala Lumpur Cricket Association

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Was PROD deleted then restored via WP:RFU. Single reference added, not enough to fulfill the notability requirements. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Cricket,  and Malaysia. UtherSRG (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Typically, only regional cricket associations in ICC full member states are deemed notable. Malaysia being an Associate Member doesn't reach this threshold. That aside, coverage is WP:ROUTINE. AA (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Malaysia is a ICC member and cricket association such as the Kuala Lumpur Cricket Association has been around for many year since colonial rule and is a organisation that is promoting and helping kids through charity work in regards to cricket. It has many news articles, valid websites and social account and should remain on Wikipedia. Jana1989sl (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * But not an ICC full member and as such, a cricket association which would have a first-class domestic team that it runs. Sadly, it isn't notable in cricketing terms. AA (talk) 09:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. While there is some coverage, it's not enough for a GNG pass and there is no suitable redirect here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Per my previous rationale on the PROD nomination. RoboCric Let's chat  07:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.