Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kube Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Kube Publishing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a book publisher which has been sourced only from its own website since the outset. An attempt to speedy delete it was challenged by an IP editor. I can't find any reliable secondary sources at all about this company so, if no other editor over the last two years has been able to prove notability I think the article's time is up. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Sionk (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. I can't find any unaffiliated sources with significant coverage. Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Simplexity22 (talk) 23:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: for the reasons listed above. This page is essentially self-promotion. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 01:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not finding enough online to merit keeping this. Edwardx (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I ran a few searches, and cannot find INDEPENDENT sources that do more than mention the name of this house.  Even such mentions are very few, almost entirely confined to listing Kube as publisher book discussed.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find independent indepth coverage. --GRuban (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.