Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulanurkhva Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Kulanurkhva Church

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence that this meets WP:NBUILD. That would "require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability". (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. What i see is statement, unchallenged, that the church "was built in the late medieval period". And clicking on a link in the article brings me to a page with a map and fairly long text in some language I cannot read. Having an AFD "discussion" among uninformed persons about an ancient--hence probably wikipedia-notable--church is not helpful. --Doncram (talk) 01:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Georgia/Abkhazia apparently has a great deal of medieval churches if the dates in these articles are accurate. There are apparently no less than four in Tsebelda, Gulripshi District (the district has a population under 20,000). The churches are all falling down to lack of maintenance, indicating a lack of interest, and no substantial sources can be found on them in any language. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, right...meaning this sarcastically... as if you converse in Abkhaz and Kartvelian languages and as if you have expertly reviewed available sources. As if you are an authority in all languages and all materials everywhere.  Sure.... --Doncram (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If sources exist you're welcome to list them here. I was not able to find any. Without sources we cannot write an article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources in the English Wikipedia, no sources in the Georgian Wikipedia. WP:BURDEN for showing notability and verifiability of the content here lies on those who want to keep this, I'd say. Blithely assuming that an unsourced Wikipedia article is accurate is also "not helpful". AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  20:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. I'm a big fan of keeping old church articles, but there's not enough sourcing available to verify any details. Bearian (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.