Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulasingam Sabaratnam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗ plicit  01:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Kulasingam Sabaratnam

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Another non-notable and run-of-the-mill police officer from a batch created by the same user. Curbon7 (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. There are multiple claims to notability here. The article has two references from news sites. He received two honours, Order of the Defender of the Realm and Star of the Commander of Valour, and had several high-profile confrontations with suspected criminals. I think the two PDFs with many names are intended to confirm the two honours that he mentioned. He held the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police, although that it several levels from the top of the police hierarchy. So "run-of-the-mill" is probably incorrect in this case. Whether the accomplishments add up to notability is another matter. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.