Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kultur 2d nom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-29 07:35Z 

Kultur

 * — (View AfD)

Simply a dictionary definition. WP:NOT &c.Bookishreader45 22:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * First nomination: Articles for deletion/Kultur. Punkmorten 23:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: Sometimes, it can be worth an article for a word in another language if it describes a mode of thought, cultural fact, or something else beyond just the definition of the word itself. This i not such a case, though. Heimstern Läufer 22:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, evidently there was previously more content on this page. But it looks rather POV and unencyclopedic to me. I'm going to have a closer look. Heimstern Läufer 22:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Older revision. Punkmorten 23:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - offers only a dictionary definition so delete per Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Jayden54 22:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think there's an important article on [Kultur und Zivilisation] to be written which appears to be a significant historical/ideological debate within German discourse, but this article's just a dicdef Bwithh 00:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bwithh. There is a potential article here, but this isn't really even a good start. --Dhartung | Talk 04:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and perhaps merge with culture (with substantial revision). The 19th century German ethnological concept of kultur (roughly equivalent to "civilization" or "high culture"--so that there were kulturvölker vs. naturvölker or "primitives") gave rise to the modern anthropological concept of culture (a more general and generous usage whose meaning is a "way of life") through the work of Edward Tylor and Franz Boas. --Media anthro 13:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Now that the nonsense content was removed, it is obvious that there is no point in this article. LARS 15:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DICDEF. —ShadowHalo 22:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.