Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Paradox  society  01:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Kumal people

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I tried to Google around and see if there might be a path to cleaning this up quickly. It doesn't seem like there are enough good sources to make that possible. The only source cited within the article is a Blogspot post. One potential alternative could be merging it into Kumhar if someone else can find sufficient citations as it seems like they may be closely related, but I do not know enough about the subject matter to even understand if that is actually the right home for this content. I have no doubt that the Kumal are a real ethnic group but I think the page needs to be rewritten from the ground up. As it is currently written, it does not fit encyclopedic style. I'd be happy to help with copyediting and style if there is another editor who wants to take up citation-finding and starting a new draft from scratch. But for now I think the existing page should be deleted. Paradox society  07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Paradox  society  07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Paradox  society  07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  Paradox  society  07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanfala (talk • contribs) 12:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The article could always be trimmed down to a one-sentence stub saying the Kumal are a social group of Nepal, and that there were 121,000 of them at the time of the 2011 census.
 * Keep and stubify. Here's a source that could be added as "Further reading" for re-building the article based on a RS. –Austronesier (talk) 15:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I have removed the copyvio and added some sources to verify the basic facts. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.