Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumarasamy Visalini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. But it looks like this article still needs some clean-up editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Kumarasamy Visalini

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to meet notabilty criteria per WP:BLP1E - see concern on talk page. The single event of supposedly having an IQ of 225 is dubious as best and only 1 event, unlike other prodigies, such as Hirata and Ung-yong who have more events. aeschylus (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Engineering, Computing,  and Tamil Nadu.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: Also known as the youngest to receive various certifications and is the author of several scholarly articles (now added to article). Coverage is over several years, not just for the announcement of her IQ.
 * Rublamb (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Looking for a few more opinions here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:GNG. There is significant coverage of the subjects IQ test in The Asian Age, and their other acheivements and meeting the PM in The Hindu. SailingInABathTub 🛁 17:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep story in the Hindu as well, as well as what's in the article, confirming she has a high iq, but the article now reads more like a resume. Oaktree b (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.