Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumari (Sinop)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 21:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Kumari (Sinop)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No such place exists in Sinop Province according to reliable sources. (I couldn't reach to the author because he/she has been blocked) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 03:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 12.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  03:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Geonames gives 2 places by that name in Turkey, Kumari (Kutahya) and an alternative name for Akdeğirmen, Sinanpaşa. Neither of these are anywhere near the location shown on the map.  Unless other sources indicate this exists, it may be an alternative local name for a place, or a mistake, or a hoax, but we've no way of knowing. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. There is no such place in Sinop Province. The official list of populated places is here Besides as one can see in any on line map, the coordinates given in the article are of dense forestry and nothing else. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Definate hoax, putting co-ordinates given into google maps gives a village called BakirlizaviyeSeasider91 (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete- Does not meet wiki:GNG. Seems to be hoax. Even there are no reliable sources provided/available or sited. So delete. --Bharathiya (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:V as unverifiable. Bearian (talk) 22:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.