Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumudu Munasinghe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Kumudu Munasinghe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is a non-notable academic - fails WP:PROF. Has been tagged for notability since June 2014, without any further reliable sources cited. Dan arndt (talk) 03:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 03:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 04:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 04:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete no news stories about him linked in article and he isn't notable enough RbAxM33320 (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Delete. He doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:PROF with the current references, which contain no substantial content about the subject. A google news search provided no additional evidence. However, a google scholar search returned that his work has been cited 434 times overall (since 2007), and 359 since 2010.  I am not conversant enough to know if that is good or bad, but it appears that it might mean that he meets Criteria #1 of WP:PROF.  If I'm wrong about the number of cites (in other words, 359 is a low number), than I would argue for delete.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - the important number is the H-index, which for Munasinghe is only twelve, which is fairly low - what you'd normally expect from an associate professor. I would normally expect at least 40 for someone notable as an academic. Dan arndt (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Response Thanks - Wasn't sure so I figured someone would answer that question for me.  Will bear that in mind as a guideline in the future.  Based on that, I've changed my assessment above.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per rationales by Dan arndt and per WP:GNG -- Chamith   (talk)  18:30, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.