Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Gir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Speedily deleted G11, A7 by &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Kunal Gir

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A very slender assertion of notability, which seems largely inherited. The gym (Steel Gym} ha s a speedy tag on it, btw. TheLongTone (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC) ...incidentally article creator account has been blocked as a promotional username...TheLongTone (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per nom. Notability seems largely inherited through prominent clientele. The Gym itself is most likely not notable as stand alone article as per speedy. Given the original creator user SteelGym is blocked, I'd also bring into play a possible COI of the IP and SPA editors for both articles as their edits started a short while after user SteelGym was blocked. In this case I declare my own COI as having been involved in curating Kunal Gir as well as raising the user name for admin investigation and a sockpuppet investigation. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:51, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 19:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Notability is not inherited. GretLomborg (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO.  Dr Strauss   talk  20:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete There is not even an assertion of significance. Certainly does not meet GNG. Wikipedia is not the news and it is not a gossip column. The thing's a bit cobbled together without ever making a good coatrack. I'd suspect a promo piece, based on the foregoing, but the content doesn't reach that level. Perhaps the creators should try some alternative outlets.Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.