Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Shah (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the sources that exist aren't sufficient to prove biographical notability. As the sources provided by the Keep !voter have had a rebuttal provided, I don't think a relist to consider unseen new info is necessary Nosebagbear (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Kunal Shah (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV References are press release, profile pages. Nothing in-depth or intellectually independent that can be called a secondary sources. Heavy spam target.  scope_creep Talk  09:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Shah fails WP:GNG as he is not someone whom has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and thus he "is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Dr42 (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the references are from one publication and also some of the references are dead ,if he was notable the article would've been constantly updated and fixing deadlinks would'nt be a problem since he is a living personGeorgiamarlins (talk) 13:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 015:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Here are a few references and media coverage I found: The Entrepreneur, Forbes India,  Business Insider,  Economic Times.  Mr RD   17:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * They don't really cut it as they are all promotional in nature, and two of them are the type of coverage that is explicitly prohibited from establishing notability, re: finance information.  Lets look at each in turn:
 * * Short interview give by the subject himself. Not independent, nor secondary, nor intellectually in-depth.
 * * A longer interview on new startup company cred on startup section. Not independent, nor secondary, nor intellectually in-depth
 * * Its a slide with no explanation. Non-rs.
 * * Some name drop. Not non-rs but not fit as a ref, finance info, explicitly prohibited to proving notability.
 *  scope_creep Talk  17:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.