Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kung-Hao Liang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Kung-Hao Liang

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The most notable facts asserted appear to be an assistant professorship and leadership of a team in a company that doesn't have a Wikipedia article. I don't see where the notability is. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 10:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:CORP. Qworty (talk) 10:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete -- notability not demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 03:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. Citation counts are too low to convince me of a pass of criterion C1, and what else is there? —David Eppstein (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.