Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunio Okawara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Proto /// type  14:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Kunio Okawara
Subject of page appears unimportant. The page has no information. It was created July 5, 2005 and no substance has been added. KarenAnn 17:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Part of the problem (at least in my opinion) was that there were no categories on the article, so it was just floating out there. Categories have been added to it now, in addition to the expanded information. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  00:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

*Delete per nom. If it can be exxpanded to show importance, I'll change my vote. HotWings 20:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  19:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and I'll expand it myself. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  19:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Still have a little more to translate, but I've expanded it a bit (still have 15 years to add). ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  23:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've translated all of the credits for shows he's worked on. Is that sufficient to show notability? It's about 30 years of work. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  00:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep now that article shows notability. HotWings 18:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Articles on the Japanese and Chinese wikipedias establish that the subject is notable, and the article can easily be expanded simply by translating from those. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 23:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable person in the anime industry. Google gives more than 20,000 hits for . --Kusunose 23:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Haeleth and Kusunose, and length of article is not a criteria for deletion. hateless 23:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep needs expansion but notable person. - Wickning1 23:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Japanese and Chinese branch rulings as identified by user Haeleth.--KefkaTheClown 14:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as author has improved article considerably and I no longer think it should be deleted. KarenAnn 18:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per clean-up.   --Kunzite 01:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.