Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunjaan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 00:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Kunjaan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no reliable sources for the movie, none that I can find, and the article is a prime example of WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  14:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ETA: This article has already been through an RfA AfD in 2006, which was closed as delete. --I am  k6ka   Talk to me!   See what I have done  14:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps you mean AfD, rather than RfA. :) Safiel (talk) 20:08, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Utterly non notable and epically violates WP:CRYSTAL. Unfortunately CSD A7 does not apply to films, certainly deserves speedy deletion, but no criteria apply. Safiel (talk) 17:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm sorry but creating this was utterly moronic - It honestly couldn't fail WP:CRYSTAL any better than this!, I sure as hell would love to A7 it but as Safiel notes we unfortunately can't. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Also the closing admin may want to SALT this seeing as it was created back in 2006, I can't find nothing on Google to suggest this film even exists, I'd say this was a Hoax in '06 and is a Hoax now. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:47, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Hoax, vanity page or whatever. It claims that it will be "started" in 2018. WP:CRYSTAL certainly applies to that. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per failing WP:NF. If sources come forward showing this as filming, a recreation of a properly sourced article might be considered. For now, WP:NFF is failed and this is (at most polite) waaaaaay TOO SOON.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 10:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -per all above. We should speedy these kind of articles invoking IAR. There is nothing to discuss about. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, crearly fails WP:CRYSTAL. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 21:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Becky Sayles (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.