Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunjwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Kunjwan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've brought this to Afd because I don't think this Jainist temple is covered under WP:GNG or WP:GEOFEAT. I had initially tried to speedy this because it seemed like the author had attempted to create several different subjects on one page. Disregarding the poorly composed history section and infobox, this stub only contains references to Facebook pages. I can't seem to find any reliable English sources. If someone fluent in Hindi or Marathi could help with the sourcing, I'll withdraw this. Funny Pika! 22:08, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * speedy delete as the article isn't in English. If someone writes an English article we can take this up again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mangoe (talk • contribs) 02:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I've applied the appropriate template and noted this at WP:Pages needing translation into English. We don't speedy delete things just because they are not in English, only if they also exist on the other-language Wikipedia (or in English here). I have no way of judging the notability of the temple but have removed the English-language material on the village and inserted it into the article on the village, which was one line long. I may remove the infobox too, since most of it seems to be about the village. --Yngvadottir (talk) 13:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 00:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, per the nomination-- Jac 16888 Talk 23:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NGEO, no way to determine WP:GNG. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:24, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.