Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunlé Adeyemi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. causa sui (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Kunlé Adeyemi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

this article fails to establish notability - the references in the article are either self-published or questionable - article fails WP:CREATIVE, WP:GNG and WP:RS - article is written in a promotional tone. Amsaim (talk) 20:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear reviewer(s). I have tried to add information about this person with secondary references as much as possible, but indeed had to complete his profile with information from the NLE website. Is that not allowed? Is it an idea that I remove the text that is based on the website of NLE? There is no promotional intention behind this text. Please specify what sentences you perceived as promotional, I will delete them. Kind regards Marjoleine
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 02:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and high degree of WP:PROMOTION. - DonCalo (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep. I'm more-or-less satisfied by the notability of this person given the sources recently added.--ЗAНИA talk talk] 23:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Based on sources, satisfies WP:GNG. --Lambiam 21:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:43, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant résumé. Don't let the long list of references fool you: most of them are not independent third-party sources or proof notability! -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.