Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish terrorism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask? 10:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Kurdish terrorism
A blatant violation of WP:NPOV. Article content is so bad that once the POV is taken out there's not much left. Delete and allow someone else to write a neutral article (preferably under a less charged title) at a later time. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 20:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Move as i suggested in the talk page already. There isnt much on the article so npovisation is trivial. Although there are articles for Kurdistan Workers Party etc which spices if the article is even necesary. Maybe a category? Category:Kurdish Armed Organisations etc.. -- Cool CatTalk 20:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per serious POV concerns, which begin in the title (one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter after all). Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 20:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. If someone wants to create a referenced NPOV article on the subject in future, that would be different. Durova 22:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Move as suggested by Cool Cat. We have to distinguish between military groups and non-military opposition groups. There are many Kurdish human right activists and freedom fighters around. But military groups kill civilians just to destroy security. -- Sina Kardar 22:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a POV fork. Stifle 23:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No useful content. Remove the speculation, original research, and opinions, and there will be nothing left. Andrewa 10:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Andrewa. Palmiro | Talk 15:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.