Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuro5hin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 15:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Kuro5hin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:GNG, long-term neglect and lack of interest. Trollaxor (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2013‎ (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to meet WP:GNG with coverage in Wired and The Register cited as well as other less reputable sources, plus more Register, Geek.com (a Ziff Davis site), PC Mag, Trust in E-services: Technologies, Practices and Challenges edited by Ronggong Song. Neglect and lack of interest aren't grounds for deletion, so it's only whether it's notable that's in dispute. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Alexa confirms K5 is dying (keep per WP:NTEMP) — rybec   07:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:54, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GNG. The coverage is sufficient and indicates significance. Peter&#160;James (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.