Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Adelberger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  20:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Kurt Adelberger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphaned, and as far as I can tell, meets almost no criteria for notability. Hampton (talk) 01:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 19.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  03:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  03:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  03:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  03:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Passes WP:Prof with 12 papers in GS with over 500 cites each. Nominator needs to study WP:Prof before making further nominations in this area. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 10:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Agree that subject passes WP:PROF ArchieOof (talk) 11:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely appears to meet WP:PROF C1 and article is sourced reliably.  A  Train ''talk 22:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.