Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Osburn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Cycling records. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Kurt Osburn
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is it notable enough for a wiki page to have a Guiness World Record? I would propose merging the sentence into Cycling records Sander.v.Ginkel. (Je suis Charlie) 17:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  18:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  18:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  18:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note I found an article about him for another record see here and expanded the article . Perhapgs it's now notable enough to keep the article. Sander.v.Ginkel (Je suis Charlie) 15:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested by the nominator, although wheelie might be the better target since it's probably a matter of debate whether wheelie records really belong on a list of mainstream cycling records. Guiness is a reliable source for world records but holding one, or even more than one, doesn't automatically warrant a Wikipedia article for the holder. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.