Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Schreckling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. humblefool&reg;Deletion Reform 01:03, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Kurt Schreckling

 * Never listed. --Dmcdevit·t 07:32, July 18, 2005 (UTC)


 * I just found out who Kurt Schreckling is, he's a guy that built a jet engine using a wooden(!) compressor and a gas turbine made out of sheet metal, cut and then bent with pliers. He then flew a model aircraft with the engine. Yowwwww; respect! I don't think the article should be deleted; I think it needs to be expanded. So I vote no! WolfKeeper 21:17, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If this were a poet who had invented a new lyrical form that was not widely used but was as unknown as Schreckling, we'd delete him in a second.  Wikipedia sometimes has a tendency to give more slack to techs than to humanities types.  For consistency, I'd say delete.  Nandesuka 17:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, pioneering home-constructed turbojet engines for model aircrafts is certainly noteworthty for inclusion in my book, especially when it's referenced with an appropriate source. - Mgm|(talk) 20:37, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep borderline notable. royblumy 03:05, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Scraping the bottom limits of notability. JamesBurns 07:31, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, published author if nothing else. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 10:54, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but this is stretching it. --Titoxd 01:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems noteworthy, although it should be expanded. Binadot 03:03, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This guy is cool it is really a begning for a lot of enthusiasts like me. please keep it


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.