Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuruppanmar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Kuruppanmar

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Pure hoax just like Ezhavathy. POV pushing. Inexistent Brahminincal connection Axxn (talk) 05:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: POV pushing just like Ezhavathy. Author claims it is a Brahmin caste, but actually it is a subsection (now obsolete) amongst the Ezhavas, a peasant caste. According to the author "They are Chathurvedi brahmins, who were known as Upadhyaya". But Kuruppanmar does not have anything to do with either Brahmins or Upadhyays. Axxn (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC) (Note: This !vote is from the nominator) UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there aren't sources, then there's no way to keep this article. That said, if the Kuruppanmar were a subsect of the Ezhavas, then would it be appropriate to mention them there? And, if so, this title becomes a useful search term, and should be redirected to that target. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.