Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kviar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- jonny - m t  04:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Kviar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable? I can only see one news reference, not at major sources, and brief. Company does not seem significant enough for notability.  Chzz  ►  22:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep - The article does list sources, even though it is very peacock-ish. I would suggest keeping the article, but with a nice tag at the top.  TN ‑ X - Man  03:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  22:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete It doesn't appear notable enough for inclusion. The only purpose this article seems to serve is as an advertisement and Wikipedia is not an advertisement. Qaddosh| contribstalk 22:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability is just on the wrong side of borderline, and the advertising-like approach pushes it over the edge. 9Nak (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. Sure, it's verifiable, but I'm not sure exactly what the company is notable for, based on reading the text. —C.Fred (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment (user advocating "keep" on my talkpage). A user has left this message on my talkpage regarding this deletion discussion.  I have no opinion personally on the article or its merits (I merely relisted it for a stronger consensus earlier).  The message, linked from my talkpage in it's entirety:
 * "on possible deletion of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kviar


 * this is my 1 cent contribution to the possible deletion of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kviar


 * problem is the company is brazilian, and therefore not known by the administrators (understandably)


 * however, some of the sources cited (FOLHA DE SÂO PAULO for example) are VERY known newspapers in Brazil


 * that means that the company DOES have notability


 * I´d suggest just editing maybe some parts like "At the end of 2007 the company opened its first physical store and started a franchise system", which is kinda pointless


 * well, there you go: hope it was useful :) Galonga (talk • contribs) 18:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)"


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.