Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvitneve, Zhytomyr Oblast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Kvitneve, Zhytomyr Oblast

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Ukraine.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. An earlier version of the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kvitneve,_Zhytomyr_Oblast&oldid=1152065745 was significantly longer. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Please expand the article from the corresponding article in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - longer does not mean better, and it had the same 4 sources. And does not address the issue of no official source showing it is a legally recognized entity. Onel 5969  TT me 20:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Just to be clear which Kvitneve are we talking about?, , , , , , Kvitneve  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 23:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. It appears to be uk:Квітневе (Коростишівська міська громада), Wikidata, KOATUUU 1822583001 (the latter being evidence of legal/government existence).
 * Let’s be cautious with deletions of Ukrainian place articles: there is confusion due to recent reorganization of hromadas, and lack of access to authoritative resources because the Ukrainian government’s geographical databases seem to be offline due to the Russian invasion. —Michael Z. 17:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Appears to be a separate, recognised settlement, so meets WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.